QAR: Click Here
Conditions for approval required by: Philip Edwards

Certification of Aerospace Products to international quality Standards
Form restricted to registered, logged in users. Please return to the home page and use the Create Account option.
In QTP, could you just please replace EN3152:2017 by EN3152:2004?
FPI for Acceptance: mfg batch size is 760 parts. As per EN3152, tables 3 and 4, sampling plan for AQL = 0,065% shows a sample size equal to 200 since we have a down-arrow marked against [501 to 1200] mfg batch size. In test report, 80 parts were FP inspected. Could you please clarify?
In test report, “Dureté / hardness” section: HV5 9999 is written. This is just, to me, a typo and hopefully, hardness test results (HRC units) are listed in “Metallurgie” section. Actual sample size is in line with EN3152, table 6, column B (destructive tests). Thus, this is not blocking, just something to point out.
Many thanks in advance
Best regards
Julien
L.S.
Point 1 in the commentary on qualification #1376 (EN 3034-040) concerns changing a year from 2017 to 2004. However, in the relevant QTP it has been changed to 2005, because EN3152 indicated this.
The QTP is included in the report as “QTP EN3034-040-A 041923.
Point 2 in the commentary on qualification #1376 (EN 3034-040) concerns the sample size of the FP inspection.
In the original TR15111521, the number of FP inspected products is indicated as 80. Despite some discussion, it was decided to have 200 pieces undergo an FP inspection. The result of the FP inspection is in accordance with the specification. The respective FP has been adjusted accordingly.
The TR1511521, rev 3, EN3034-040 is now included in the qualification report.
Point 3 in the commentary on qualification #1376 (EN 3034-040) concerns “Dureté / hardness” section: HV5 9999 mentioned in TR1511521.
This is basically a software problem. If nothing is entered in this column, the system returns 9999 and HFS is working to resolve this in the future.
The actual hardness values are in hardness test results (HRC units) and are listed in “Metallurgy” section. Actual sample size is in line with EN3152, table 6, column B (destructive tests), as the comment indicates.
Regards
Kees
Approved as comments have been addressed