QAR: Click Here
Conditions for approval required by: Julien Gauther
Certification of Aerospace Products to international quality Standards
Form restricted to registered, logged in users. Please return to the home page and use the Create Account option.
audit-678-EN4178H060006F_F.A.I.1759628:
Page 4/29
As per ISO5855-2, minimum minor diameter = 4,713 mm.
In FAI1759628, minimum minor diameter = 4,714 mm.
Anyway, the difference is only 1 µm, which is insignificant.
Page 18/29
Wrong sample size for dye penetrant inspection: 200 parts should have been dye penetrant inspected instead of 80 (original lot size = 763 parts). We agree with the fact that ARCONIC Toulouse modified its sampling plan to be in line with ISO2859-1 few months ago (Mr. BANIEE’s email, May 14th 2019). Thus, this comment is just for information.
Page 20/29
Recess torque test.
This test has been done as per NASM1312-25.
As per EN4178, recess is defined by EN3911 and EN3905 is the corresponding technical specification.
Could you please justify that NASM1312-25 is equivalent to EN3905?
Many thanks in advance for replying,
Regards.
julien
herewith the answer to your question about recess test under NASM 1312-25
Arconic has refered to this standard because they haven’t the specific tooling mentionned in the EN 3905
Nevertheless they have made the test following the requierments of the EN ;
that means :
5 samples tested,
15 cycles done following the couple mentionned in the EN ( 24 Nm for a 6 mm diameters) without grease ( for information NASM asked to grease the recess).
From my point of view it is acceptable
I have the Arconic report updated with these informations that I could record in this dossier after your agreement.
( In order to avoid any further discussions for this test( or others), I suggest to ask to ASD STAN to add the EN 3905 ( or other test standards ) in the colonn test in the technical specifications)
Hello Daniel,
Thank you very much for this detailed reply ! It is now good for me.
Have a nice day.
Regards.